500 añosde calle.60 díaspara borrarla.

The Valencian Directorate-General for Cultural Heritage expressly identifies Specific Amendment No. 25 as an action with heritage impact on the Traditional Historic Core, classified as a Local Relevance Asset.

The heritage report is favourable, but not unconditional: before any licence is granted for the recessed penthouse floor, a visual impact study must be submitted proving that there is no impact on the Traditional Historic Core and it must be assessed by the Town Council.

For the association, this condition opens a legal maze: if the penthouse is the element supporting the planning compensation of MP25, a matter that may alter viability, economic balance, volume and coherence cannot simply be deferred to the licence stage.

The association has therefore filed an extension to its objections, asking the Town Council not to give final approval to MP25 without first resolving the urban-planning, heritage and economic consequences of this condition.

The extended legal strategy shifts the focus from the recessed penthouse floor to the full planning arrangement enabled by MP25.

The association warns that the heritage impact may also derive from a built screen or blind wall of approximately 15 metres wide and 14.90 metres high, located behind protected one- or two-storey homes in the NHT-BRL.

For that reason, the visual impact study should not be limited to the penthouse nor deferred to the licence stage if its outcome may affect the heritage viability of the planning arrangement. The association is preparing an administrative appeal, interim suspension, technical inspection, supplementary Culture report and visual study before approval of MP25.